I've written about all the good and healthy reasons for knitting: see
In defense of knitting, parts 1-10, (written between Jan 23, 2012 to Feb 23, 2013). And whether or not we know all the science discussed in those posts, we know intuitively that knitting is a good way to engage our hands and pass our time.
But if we had asked our grandmothers why they knit, they would not have talked about health benefits. They would
not have said
I like the meditative state knitting induces. And they would
not have talked about lessons in patience. They would have talked about knitting as
product, not
process.
I've talked about
knitting as product before, to the extent of establishing my own personal rant:
knit what you wear, wear what you knit. But I have recently discovered another entree into this subject, and I'm encouraged to share it with you.
Okay, if we think about knitting
purely as product,
why and what do we knit?
1. Knitting as ART
How to define
knitting as ART? We know it when we see it: a piece that hangs on a gallery wall, a piece that makes a
statement! a piece from one of our renowned designers (someone who exhibits in the Royal Albert Museum).
We can replicate these pieces of famous designers, or we can create something of our own--perhaps a 72-row lace shawl in a hand-dyed. The results are wonderful and much to be admired.
But when a member of the general public (MOTGP) sees one of these pieces, she (and I use the generic
she here) does not think
Wow, I need to learn how to knit so I can do that! She sees an
art sweater as completely beyond her abilities--and perhaps not even hand-knit. Unless she knows you well, she doesn't know that lace shawl didn't come off a machine in China!
And there's another thing to be said about
knitting as ART. When we wear a piece of art, we can feel as if the piece is
wearing us rather than us
wearing it. (I will never forget watching a woman struggle with, and then throw down, her Kaffe Fassett coat, saying
I am tired of this piece wearing me! The coat was heavy and unshaped: it was beautiful but uncomfortable.) It goes without saying that walking around in a piece of art might not be something many of us can manage?
2. Knitting as CRAFT
And what is
knitting as CRAFT? We know this when we see it too. It might be the best incarnation of our most well-known knitting techniques:
fairisle (and please excuse my use of the machine knitting term),
intarsia,
Aran, lace, double or modular knitting. All of these are express our craft in its most recognizable and most beloved fabrics.
But when a MOTGP sees one of these pieces, she will--again--not think
Wow, I need to learn to not so I can do that! These pieces are also seen as beyond her abilities. Yes, she will know it's hand knit, but she will not see it as something can ever make.
AND she might see one of these garments as something she would not easily wear. Think for a moment of these high-craft pieces with their complications of stitch and/or colour. To avoid difficulties through shaping, they are most often drafted as
drop shoulders. And while I frequently find myself
defending the drop shoulder in classes, students will insist that they
don't like it: it doesn't fit,
it's uncomfortable, it's sloppy, or
it has too much fabric at the underarm.
So, when we
knit for CRAFT--and hone our knitting techniques to their highest level--we can make garments that are
beautiful but not necessarily
flattering. (I will never forget a story told by a woman who made my set-in sleeved
Gray Cardigan: the first time she wore it someone said
Oh how exquisite! It looks hand knit, but then I realized it couldn't be because it fits you too well.) Wrongly or not, making ill-fitting garments seems to be our reputation: I wonder if knitting purely for craft doesn't contribute to this a bit?
3. Knitting as FASHION
I remember my friend, Lee Andersen, telling us in a workshops that we needed to know why we were knitting: which of these 3 was our highest priority,
art, craft, or
fashion? I knew I was
knitting for FASHION. And I also knew I as in the minority.
Some students thought
FASHION meant
HIGH FASHION, so they didn't see that as a reason to knit. But I didn't take it that way. I took it to mean
fashion something with my hands that would express my personal fashion.
Another reason (I was in a minority) might be that, unlike our grandmothers, we of this generation knit for process--because we can afford to, because we can (with globalization)
buy what we wear. We know that purchased garment is the right colour, the right length, the right size. None of these are guaranteed with our hand knits. So we knit for
art and we knit for
craft--worthy reasons to spend our money on yarn and our time on knitting.
BUT, as said earlier, we don't produce pieces that a MOTGP recognizes as attainable or wearable. So if we
knit for FASHION, might this change. And what would those attainable and wearable pieces be?
Look in your closet: what do you wear most often? Simple shapes? Solid colours? Pieces that fit? Pieces with something of interest that raises them beyond the purely simple?
These are the things that express my
personal fashion. And I can tell you that
rarely do I wear a hand knit without a MOTGP (a sales person in a women's clothing store, a customer in a shoe store, a stranger at an airport, a member of the cleaning staff at a hotel, a waitress in a restaurant) stopping me to say
- I love your top / vest / sweater!
- Where did you get it?
- You KNIT IT? It doesn't look hand knit!!!
- Was it difficult?
- Could I do it?
Or some version of the above. Every time. And I'm going to make a major assumption here by asking if
this is not a reaction we'd all--at least occasionally--want?
How do we get that reaction? For every piece we
knit as ART, for every piece we
knit as CRAFT, we should
knit one piece for FASHION! They won't be the most interesting or technique-heavy pieces we knit, but we--knitters, our community, our craft, and the MOTGP--will all be better for it!